Pdf surrogates robert venditti free pdf download. Earth to Echo (2014) F. Surrogates (2009) Saving Mr. Deception and the Iran deal: Did the Obama administration mislead America, or did the Rhodes profile? Even before the print version was released, Sunday. Specifically, the piece contends that the administration . Rather, the Rhodes interview provides window dressing for a trumped- up jeremiad against the administration. The Stepfather (2009) CAM XVID-PrisM - 100% REAL - VERY GOOD QUALITY. The Echo (2009) Surrogates 2009; Cheri (2009) Donkey Punch 2008; The Escape (2009) Moon (2009). Universal Audio is the leading developer of audio recording products, including analog classics by Bill Putnam, and award-winning UAD plug-ins for Pro Tools, Logic. B-Movie - The Platinum Collection - 05 - Just An Echo.mp3 (8.41 MB) B-Movie. Ten torrent nie zosta. Dodaj pierwszy komentarz. Samuels is entitled to his opinions, but articulating them in the nation. He and his White House colleagues assembled a formidable messaging machine, enlisting an array of enthusiastic advocates for the deal to create . Left unsaid in the Times piece is that the administration. As others have explained, this is the normal stuff of politics, shrewdly adapted by strategists like Rhodes and his rivals to advance their cause in the internet age. In addition to this digital strategy, Rhodes and other senior U. S. Advocacy groups on both sides of the debate eagerly jumped into the fray, dispatching their partisans to European hotels to stalk the sidelines of the negotiations and feed quotes to the hordes of journalists assembled in anticipation of news. The opponents of the deal never managed to muster a persuasive case to the contrary or to articulate a credible alternative that better served U. S. Instead, the article advances a series of unconfirmed or questionable assertions as established facts. The suggestion that Obama or his surrogates painted a false image of Iran is demonstrably untrue. Political change was never an American precondition for the nuclear diplomacy with Iran. Bush first conceded to a bargaining process with Tehran over the nuclear issue in 2. Obama sought to resolve the crisis even while Iran. And Obama administration officials repeatedly emphasized that the accord does not rely on the expectation of political change within Iran. On the day after the agreement was finalized, Obama explained in a press conference that . It’s not contingent on Iran suddenly operating like a liberal democracy. It solves one particular problem, which is making sure they don’t have a bomb. That same week, Secretary of State John Kerry, who was deeply engaged in negotiating the agreement, characterized Iran. So there are no illusions about that. What we know, however, is that an Iran without a nuclear weapon is a very different country than Iran with one, and that a Middle East without a nuclear weapon is a safer Middle East. It was only after the June 2. Hassan Rouhani, a self- described moderate, that American efforts to jumpstart serious talks with Iran on its nuclear program began to make progress, after seven years of futile attempts by both the Bush and Obama administrations. Getting the diplomatic timeline straight. The duration of the negotiating process highlights another serious issue in the Times piece, which asserts that the administration presented an . In his campaign for the presidency, Obama advocated for direct engagement with Iran, and after he was elected, he engaged in both public and private diplomatic overtures toward Tehran. The public aspects of this diplomacy are well- known: for example, Obama. Obama sent several letters to Khamenei. The existence of those meetings was revealed long before the signing, or selling, of the final nuclear deal, and their substance. One American representative described the meetings as . Obama reached out covertly to Rouhani, and several influential U. S. This backchannel was also widely reported long before the comprehensive agreement was finalized. Secret diplomacy entails risks as well as rewards, and the covert talks with Tehran provoked some discomfort among U. S. However, the Obama administration. And the argument that Rhodes or other officials were . Nor do any of the other U. S. And nowhere does the article assemble actual evidence to corroborate this provocative description of the Obama administration. This proposition was first and most fully articulated by my former colleague Michael Doran, now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, in a 2. Its thesis clearly animates many of the deal. But absent evidence, the premise that Obama harbors a . Or, as Ben Rhodes might say, spin. And there are legitimate grounds for debate over the administration. One friend in the region commented recently that he supported the deal in spite of. Its deficiencies may reflect preconceptions on the part of its author; Samuels last year warned, with almost Rhodes- ian grandiloquence, of . In their absence, it is an unfortunate irony that the White House master of spin.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2018
Categories |